Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1928No. 18551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Where an administrator claims compensation for extraordinary services, the burden is upon him to show the nature, character, extent, and value of such services. Clements v. Fletcher, 161 Ga. 21 (3 b), 46 (129 S. E. 846). In the instant case, in which a verdict was rendered in favor of an administratrix by a jury in the superior court on appeal from the court of ordinary, certain of thg *414extraordinary services enumerated by the administratrix in her testimony, such as her efforts in resisting a caveat to her appointment as permanent administratrix (Fields v. Case, 137 Ga. 147 (2), 72 S. E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Clements v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Fields v. CaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API