Hoyt v. Ware

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The rulings made in headnotes 1 and 2 require no elaboration.

The attacks upon the portions of the answer of the administrator were made in the form of motions to strike those portions of the answer upon the grounds stated. It will be observed in headnote 3 that we treat these motions to strike as demurrers *102to those parts of the answer referred to, and'we are of the opinion that they should be so treated.

The ruling made in headnote 4 needs no elaboration.

The demurrer of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., referred to in the statement of facts, was…