Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Pearson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2001No. 00-30086PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Thomas Pearson (“Pearson”), was convicted of violating criminal provi sions of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7412(f)(4) and (h), and 7413(c)(1). Pearson appeals his conviction on several grounds. First, he contends the district court improperly instructed the jury regarding the elements of the charged offense. Next, Pearson asserts the district court prohibited him from presenting a defense by improperly sustaining objections to his testimony during direct examination. Finally, Pearson challenges the sentencing enhancements applied pursuant to §§…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Foti v. City of Menlo ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Alfonso Labrada Gurolla, United States of America v. Jose Reyes Ortega-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Manuel Barraza LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Charles YiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Dennis PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edgar Alvirez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. WR GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.