Dunaway v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Defendant asserts that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals is in conflict with a prior decision of this court and a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, to wit: Leonard v. United States, 378 U.S. 544, 84 S.Ct. 1696, 12 L. Ed.2d 1028, in which the entire opinion is as follows :
“Per Curiam.
“Petitioner was convicted in separate trials and by different juries of forging and uttering endorsements on government checks, 18 U.S.C. § 495, and of transportation of a forged instrument in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The two cases were tried in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Leonard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Dunaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bighames v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.