Legal Opinion
Leonard v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 22, 1964No. 1017 MPublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner was convicted in separate trials and by different juries of forging and uttering endorsements on government checks, 18 U. S. C. § 495, and of transportation of a forged instrument in interstate commerce, 18 U. S. C. § 2314. The two cases were tried in succession. The jury in the case tried first — forging and uttering endorsements — announced its guilty verdict in open court in the presence of the jury panel from which the jurors who were to try the second case — transportation of a forged instrument — were selected. Petitioner immediately objected to selecting a jury for the…
2Cited by92 opinions
- People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Brian Keith Moore v. Philip Parker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.