Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2000PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, J.:

¶ 1 Felix Ortiz appeals from the order which revoked his parole and recommitted him to serve the balance of his county-sentence of imprisonment consecutive to a state sentence of imprisonment imposed for the offense upon which the parole revocation was based. Appellant alleges that the consecutive nature of the recommitment violates double jeopardy protection. Finding no constitutional violation, we affirm.

¶2 The facts show that appellant entered an open plea on January 14, 1998, to aggravated assault (Lehigh County criminal case, docket number 3084/1997). Appellant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. duPontSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. BischofSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. SharpeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Greater Erie Industrial Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API