Legal Opinion

United States v. 8 Automobiles

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 28, 1943No. Nos. 95, 100; No. 206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

No. 95 is a suit by the United States of America to condemn eight second-hand or used automobiles, No. 100 is a sui* to condemn two second-hand or used automobiles, and No. 206 is a suit to condemn four second-hand or used automobiles, seized under the Act of June 15, 1917, 40 Stat. 223 et seq., and Amendments, Sections 401 to 410, 22 U.S.C.A. Otis Mc-Nabb, of Corpus Christi, Texas, hereinafter for brevity called Claimant, has intervened, claiming all of the automobiles.

Some evidence has been offered here, some facts have been stipulated, and by stipulation, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. 251 Ladies DressesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  2. United States v. BarenoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  3. United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. 7 Cartons of Wearing ApparelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  3. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API