Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosenberg

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 21, 1942No. 36852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This case comes before this Court on-two exactly similar motions, and proposed demurrers, but made on behalf of different defendants, by defendants’ attorneys, and' were argued together, and one opinion-will suffice.

The defendants, Josef Rosenberg, Samuel' Freier, Fereno Weisz, Ernest Weisz, and Irene Weisz, move for leave to withdraw their pleas of not guilty, heretofore interposed by them to the indictment herein,, and to substitute in place and stead thereof, a demurrer in the form suggested.

Permission to withdraw pleas, and file proposed demurrers, is granted, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. 251 Ladies DressesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  3. United States v. 8 AutomobilesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  4. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API