State v. Tapia

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge.

Pete Tapia was found guilty by a jury of having committed the offense of armed robbery. He appeals the judgment imposing sentence and claims the trial court committed reversible error because: (a) the verdict was contrary to the weight of the évidence; (b) evidence was introduced of an extra judicial nature with respect to identity of the accused and, (c) that receipt of such evidence constituted fundamental error.

The challenge made on the jury verdict, as being contrary to the weight of the evidence, compels, us, under well established principles, to. deny the same.

On…