Legal Opinion
State v. Jacobs
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1978No. 3169PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant, another male, and a female were charged with conspiracy to obtain Preludin, a controlled substance, by misrepresentation, fraud or forgery. Convicted, defendant appeals. We discuss: (1) mug shots to prove identity; (2) evidence of conspiracy and the coconspirator rule; (3) hearsay and the right of confrontation; and (4) motion to amend the docketing statement.
It is uncontradicted that two forged prescriptions were used in attempts to obtain Preludin from various pharmacies in Clovis. All the attempts were unsuccessful..
Mug Shots to Prove Identity
State’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LunnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Jesse Joseph Trujillo v. George E. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. HoxsieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.