F.C. v. State

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

T1 F.C. Jr. (Father) appeals from a juvenile court decree permanently terminating his parental rights in F.C. III (Child). We affirm.

12 First, Father argues that by failing to decide the State's motion for no reunification services (the State's motion) prior to conducting the termination of parental rights hearing,1 the juvenile court erred because, in *791effect, it had not decided whether reunification services would be offered to Father. This argument is unsupported by the record and is without merit. The juvenile court had rendered a final determination about…