Legal Opinion
B.H. v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 16, 2013No. 20130270-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decision
2Per curiam
{1 BH. (Mother) appeals the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights in R.D. We affirm.
12 Mother first asserts that the juvenile court committed plain error when it permitted the father's (Father) counsel to represent Father when counsel had a conflict of interest. To demonstrate plain error, a party must show that an error exists, that the error should have been obvious to the court, and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the case. State v. Dean, 2004 UT 63, ¶ 15, 95 P.3d 276. Given that there is nothing in the record regarding…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. B.R.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- State v. DeanUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- F.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re R.D. (B.H. v. State)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- In re C.J.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- R.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- R.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017