State in Interest of Ac
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
2Per curiam
¶ 1 R.C. (Father) appeals the juvenile court's order terminating his parental rights to A.C., L.C., and R.C. We affirm.
12 Father asserts that the juvenile court erred in denying his motion to continue the trial pending resolution of certain pro se petitions for extraordinary relief that were filed in various courts. Rule 54 of the Utah Rules of Juvenile Procedure provides that "once a matter has been set for trial, the matter may be continued only with the approval of the court." Utah R. Juv. P. 54(a). Absent unavoidable cireumstances, "no continuance shall be granted in any child…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. B.R.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- F.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. V.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008
4Cited by4 opinions
- H.K. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- In re A.C...(R.C. v. State)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- C.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- In re A.K. and M.K. (H.K. v. State)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012