Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bernheim

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1923No. Civ. No. 4565PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Defendant Bernheim appeals from a judgment rendered against him and defendant Taylor in the sum of $2,833.19. Defendant Taylor failed to appear in the action and judgment went against him by default. Defendant Bernheim concedes that the sum of $472.30 was due from him to plaintiffs and on the trial offered to have judgment entered against him for that amount.

The complaint is in two counts. The first is for the recovery of money paid under a written agreement for the purchase of an automobile upon the ground that the vendors therein did not have title and the consideration for which the money…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc. v. SeeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. J. M. Wildman, Inc. v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Sumner v. FlowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Rigney v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Perry v. Washington National Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API