Sumner v. Flowers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question posed is whether parol evidence may be received to show that a signatory to a contract was in fact the agent of a fully disclosed principal.
Appellants Sumner and Farber and respondent Furnish, prior to August 11, 1941, were associated on the staff of Madison Hospital, Los Angeles. Sumner was a business administrator, Farber an osteopathic doctor, and Furnish, a medical physician. After lengthy consultation, the three men on August 11, 1941, purchased the Pioneer Hospital of Los Angeles and took title in the name of defendant Flowers, as nominee of the purchasers. Thereafter, they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc. v. SeeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garland v. FleischmannUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Coburn v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- American Builder's Assn. v. Au-YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- J. M. Wildman, Inc. v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Styner v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.