Legal Opinion
United States v. Brandenburg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 2, 1947No. 9268PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.
On January 30, 1945, defendant, a doctor, was indicted on 11 counts charging him with violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, § 2, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 2554. Trial resulted in conviction on all counts. He appealed. This court, after finding the indictment and the government’s proof sufficient, ordered a new trial because hearsay statements written on the back of several exhibits were permitted to go out with the jury. 1946, 3 Cir., 155 F.2d 110. Subsequently brought to trial again on substantially the same testimony as was adduced at the first trial,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Morei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. LindenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Frederick W. Klosterman. United States v. John R. Deeney, Jr. United States v. Joseph A. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Harry Morris Sherman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Irene Ethel Vinyard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.