Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2006No. 20060081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINSTATEMENT GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] Cheryl Ellis petitioned for reinstatement to the bar, and Disciplinary Counsel filed objections to the report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board which recommended Ellis be reinstated. We order that Ellis be reinstated to practice law in this state upon the condition she pass the bar examination and pay the costs of the reinstatement proceedings, and we remand to the hearing panel for a determination of those costs.

I

[¶ 2] In 1989, Ellis was suspended from the practice of law for two years, with imposition of all but the first 90 days of the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Disciplinary Board v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Application of ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Montgomery v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Varriano (In re Varriano )North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Stensland v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BureshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BureshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Action Against BureshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API