Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Varriano (In re Varriano )

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2018No. 20150342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Attorney Richard Varriano objects to a recommendation of a Disciplinary Board hearing panel to this Court that his conditional reinstatement to practice law be revoked and that he be required to petition for reinstatement. We reject the hearing panel's recommendation and continue Varriano's reinstatement subject to modified conditions.

I

[¶ 2] Varriano was admitted as an attorney in North Dakota on January 5, 1988. In In re Varriano , 2010 ND 12, ¶ 8, 777 N.W.2d 852, this Court reciprocally suspended Varriano from the practice of law for one year based on ethics violations in Minnesota…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against VarrianoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Solem v. ALPS Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API