Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Buresh
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partVande Walle, Chief Justice
[¶ 18] I agree Buresh violated the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct and the North Dakota Rules of Lawyer Discipline noted in the majority opinion. However I would follow the Hearing Panel’s recommendation of an 18-month suspension.
[¶ 19] The term “disbarment” may carry a tone of finality. In reality, where disbarment is not permanent, and I do not understand the majority opinion to permanently disbar Buresh, the difference between disbarment and suspension is essentially a factor of time rather than one of finality. Thus, N.D. Stds. Imposing Lawyer Sanctions 2.1 provides:
Disbarment.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grievance Commission v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Disciplinary Action Against KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Ellis v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978