Legal Opinion
Smith v. Railroad
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. Andrew AllisoN, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtBurton, J.
Under the will of Jos. ~W. Baugh, certain real estate and the “ one-fifth part in value” of his personal estate, was bequeathed to *224the complainant, his daughter, then Fannie E. Baugh, subject to the following limitations:
“ To have and to hold the same, together with the increase, rents, and profits thereof, to her sole and separate use and benefit, and free from the debts, contracts, liabilities, and control of any husband whom she may marry, and for and during the term of her natural life; and at her death the said property, real and personal, together with the increase, rents, and profits…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dewing v. PerdicariesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Loring v. Salisbury MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- St. Romes v. Levee Steam Cotton Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Figuers v. SherrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Legere v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Unaka National Bank v. Butler ex rel. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.