Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Fulk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1940No. 27625PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

The question to be determined is whether all the funds represented by the certificates of deposit in The Sunbury Savings So Loan Company belong to John W. Fulk, surviving husband, individually, or one-half to the estate of Ida B. Fulk, deceased. In arriving at its conclusion the Court of Appeals considered certain parol testimony of Dwight C. Hoover, secretary of The Sunbury Savings & Loan Company, who prepared and executed the certificates of deposit in the name of John or Ida Fulk. The husband, John W. Fulk, also testified in the Probate Court and Court of Common Pleas in respect to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BolinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. West v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Humphrey v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. O'Brien v. BieggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Shields v. United States National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Henry v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API