Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 30, 2010No. 08-4736UnpublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Nathan Cooper (“Cooper”) appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his complaint against appellee Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6), and the District Court’s decision to construe his consumer fraud claim under Arizona, rather than New Jersey, law. We will affirm.
I. Background
A. Factual History
In October 2005, plaintiff-appellant Cooper purchased a 61-inch television manufactured by defendant-appellee Samsung from a retail store located in Maricopa County, Arizona. The model of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Elizabeth F. Shuder and Robert J. Shuder v. McDonald Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- ARLANDSON v. Hartz Mountain Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.