Lupoli v. Lupoli
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant Gale Lupoli1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure and the denial of her *640motion to open and set aside the judgment. The defendant claims (1) that the trial court improperly sustained the plaintiffs objections to the defendant’s proffered testimony relating to threats made against her during her purported execution of the mortgage note and deed, (2) that that court failed to find that the mortgage being foreclosed was invalid because it lacked two witnesses, and (3) that the court’s factual conclusions were not supported by the evidence.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- City of Groton v. Yankee Gas Services Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Coble v. MaloneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Molk v. MicklewrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FratarcangeliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Lupoli v. LupoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- S.B-R v. J.DConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021