Legal Opinion

Shaw v. City of Rupert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1984No. 14482Published

1Opinion of the Court

681 P.2d 1001 (1984)

106 Idaho 526

Dean SHAW and Alice Shaw, husband and wife, Paul Crane and LaVieve Crane, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF RUPERT, a municipal corporation, Hamilton & Voeller, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a H & V Engineering, Inc., and Galey Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

H & V ENGINEERING, INC., an Idaho corporation, Cross-Claimant,

v.

CITY OF RUPERT, a municipal corporation, and Galey Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Cross-Defendants.

CITY OF RUPERT, a municipal corporation, Cross-Claimant,

v.

H & V ENGINEERING, INC., an…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. Palmer v. Idaho Bank & Trust of KooskiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API