Legal Opinion

United States v. Aiken

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided November 22, 1999No. 97-0233-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNT THREE OF SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT AND TO SEVER TRIAL OF CAPITAL AND NONCAPITAL DEFENDANTS

GOLD, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendant, Ian Orville Aiken’s Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Superseding Indictment for Lack of Venue [D.E. #408, 440], and the Motions for Severance filed by the capital defendant, Ian Orville Aiken [D.E. # 374], and by the non-capital defendants, Roland David Aiken, Daniel Patrick Aiken, Donovan Sibb-ley and Eric Livingston Morris [D.E. # 371], For reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EdelinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  2. United States v. LujanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API