Markell v. Kasson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
In Equity. Bill and cross-bill for an injunction, etc. On dismissal of original bill.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
In No. 1,903 this question is presented: There was an ejectment suit to recover possession of some mining property. Auxiliary to that, a bill in equity was filed for an injunction to restrain the working, on which a temporary injunction was issued. Thereafter the defendants filed a cross-bill praying, on their behalf, a temporary injunction , and also setting up a contract for the conveyance of a little fraction of ground. The ejectment suit was dismissed. The complainants in the original bill dismissed their bill, and insist that by that dismissal the cross-bill also went out of court. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holgate v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lowenstein v. GlidewellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1878
- Orendorff v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Blythe v. HinckleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n v. SaundersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- San Diego Flume Co. v. SoutherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.