Legal Opinion

State v. Downing

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1901PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. A contempt proceeding having been instituted against F. O. Downing for not obeying an order of court, he was adjudged guilty, and from this order he appeals. Further facts appear in the opinions. A motion to dismiss the appeal was overruled, opinion by Judge 'Wolverton, and the case was heard on its merits and affirmed, opinion by Judge Moore.

1Opinion of the Court 1

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

2Opinion of the Court · WolvertonChief Justice Wolverton

On October 7, 1897, the relator, Thomas J. Hammer, obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County against the appellant, F. O. Downing, *312and one F. H. Hopkins, as partners under the firm name of Downing, Hopkins & Company, for $7,817.50, with accruing interest and costs. On April 4, 1898, it appearing in a proceeding supplemental to execution that Downing had $10,000 in his possession and under his control liable to execution upon said judgment, which he unjustly refused to apply towards the payment of the same, the court made…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey's Heirs v. WaitOregon Supreme Court · 1882

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Mix v. NewlandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Winters v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Marquam v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. La FolletteOregon Supreme Court · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API