Payson Building & Loan Soc. v. Taylor
Utah Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice
It is not necessary in setting up duress in the form of a threatened criminal action to set out that the threatener had recited as a basis of his threat such facts which would amount technically and legally to a crime; if, on accurate and detailed analysis, it is found that the acts he was said to have done would not themselves constitute a crime, they may nevertheless be sufficient to invest the mind of the person threatened with such fear as not to make his choice of contract a free one. The modem doctrine seems to be well stated in the case of Wilbur v. Blanchard, 22 Idaho 517, 126 P.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Snyder v. Charleston & Southside Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.