Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ozone Tung Cooperative

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 13, 1950No. 39539Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

James E. Kelly, Mrs. Sarah Schwartz Kelly, and Francis E. Bickford instituted this proceeding in the Twenty-second Judicial District Court of St. Tammany Parish for a writ of mandamus directed to John E. Brewster, clerk of that court, commanding him “to issue execution to enforce the ■payment” of all the costs in a . certain suit •styled “Kelly et al. v. Ozone Tung Cooperative’’. In this proceeding these parties prayed that the Ozone Tung Cooperative, defendant in that suit, be ordered to pay 'all costs or to show cause to the contrary, but the defendant was never cited and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pasley v. McConnellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  2. Blaize v. CazezuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Murrell v. MurrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. Fontini v. Pine Grove Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Kelly v. Ozone Tung CooperativeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API