Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ozone Tung Cooperative

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1948No. 3034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On October 15, 1948, within the delay period fixed by law, Act No. 16 of 1910, § 1, Dart's Code of Practice Art. 9205, the appellants, James E. Kelly, Mrs. Sara Schwartz Kelly and Francis E. Bickford filed an application for a rehearing in this cause, contending that we erred in nine particular instances. After a thorough review of the record, we are unable to agree with the appellants that we have committed any errors in our finding of fact.

On November 4, 1948, thirty days after the rendition of our decree and after the delay period as fixed by the law had well expired, the appellants filed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gautreaux v. HarangSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lomenick v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Jones v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Kelly v. Ozone Tung CooperativeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API