Legal Opinion
Blaize v. Cazezu
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 5, 1945No. 38003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
William Cazezu, the defendant appellee, moves to dismiss the appeal in this cause on the ground that the appeal bond furnished by Frank J. Blaize, the appellant, is' incompetent, insufficient and of no effect for-the reason that the bond is not executed in accordance with the provisions of sec. 4 of Act 112 of 1916.
The appellant answered the motion to dismiss, setting forth that the bond is valid and sufficient and, as a matter of precaution, filed a supplemental bond signed by a surety company authorized to do business in this State.
The original appeal bond was signed for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lampton Realty Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Pittman v. LillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Succession of UthoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Fontini v. Pine Grove Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Hammond State Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Box & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Guilliot v. City of KennerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Allen v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Arrow Construction Co., Inc. v. American Emp. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Succession of RothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.