Legal Opinion

Jones v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1847PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was an action of replevin brought by the appellants against the appellee, for the wrongful detention of 500 bushels of corn. There were two pleas. 1st, non detinet, and, 2d, property in one Thomas Powell. The cause was submitted to the Court below, by consent, upon an agreed statement of the facts. Upon these facts, the Court found for the defendant on the issue presented by the second plea, namely, that the com was the property of Powell, and judgment was rendered accordingly. From this finding and judgment the plaintiffs appealed.

The following were the material facts in evidence: One…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lane v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Shepard v. PhilbrickNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. V. Dickenson v. Jackson ex dem. CaldwellNew York Supreme Court · 1826

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank v. McCambridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Beckman v. SikesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Heavilon v. Farmers BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Salmon v. FewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API