Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Sikes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Riley District Court. Action by Silces against ReeJcman and another, to recover the value of a certain crop of corn and oats. Judgment for plaintiff for $292 and costs, at the December Term, 1884. The defendants bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This action was brought by W. H. Sikes, to recover the value of a crop of corn and oats alleged to have been converted by the plaintiffs in error, John F. and C. H. Beckman, who were defendants below. It appeared upon the trial that one C. M. Baker was the owner of the land upon which the crop was grown. He had mortgaged the land, and the conditions of the mortgage having been broken, it was foreclosed on December 15,1883. There being a stipulation in the mortgage for a waiver of appraisement, it was decreed that the land should be sold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lane v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Downard v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Shepard v. PhilbrickNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Jones v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Sherman v. . WillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank v. McCambridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Polley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Goodwin v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Jones v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Caldwell v. AlsopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API