State v. Consolidated Independent School District of Palo
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — Milo P. Smith, Judge. The trial court dissolved said district. The question is whether, upon the consideration of such ballots as were legal, there was, in fact, a majority for dissolution.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
1- error?' afs-schooiondistrict. I. Whether the district has been lawfully dissolved can be decided here only upon what is, in a sense, a recount. In making such recount, we must proceed under the following limitations: (a) The review is not de novo, (b) Where the question whether a mark constitutes an objectionable identification is a doubtful question, the finding below on that point has the standing of a verdict, (c) The successful party may, without appealing or assigning errors, save the judgment by showing that er*960rors were committed against him below which, if corrected, will make the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Voorhees v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Campbell v. ParkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Royer v. King's Crown Plaster Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- In Re Fence Dispute Between SwisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Naill v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Northern Trust Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Ottumwa Boiler Works v. M. J. O'Meara & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.