Royer v. King's Crown Plaster Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — IIon. James H. Rothrock, Judge. This is an action for damages for personal injuries. There was a, verdict for the defendants. Upon motion of the plaintiff, the trial court awarded a new tidal. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The defendant is a corporation and the plaintiff was one of its employees. On March 18, 1907, the plaintiff was injured to some extent by the fall of a low scaffold. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. Upon motion of the plaintiff, the trial court awarded him a new trial. Erom such order awarding a new trial the defendant has appealed. The contention of the defendant in argument is that there was no error in the record prejudicial to the plaintiff, and therefore he was not entitled to a new trial." Defendant further contends that upon the whole record the defendant was entitled to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Voorhees v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Kern v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by20 opinions
- Morton v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- In Re Estate of HollisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Woodbury Co. v. Dougherty & Bryant Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Thomas v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.