Legal Opinion
Kokenge v. Whetstone
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MORROW, J.
Hyde Park is a Cincinnati suburb. In 1899 the Mooney subdivision of one hundred and two lots was laid out therein. These lots were sold throughout the next twenty years, the last four in 1919. All of the deeds from the subdivision owner contained the following restriction:
“Said property herein conveyed shall be used exclusively for residential purposes.”
The so-called Hyde Park Square business block on Erie Avenue lies immediately to the east of the subdivision, and the block hi the Mooney subdivision immediately west of Hyde Park Square on Erie Avenue contains property of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Hayslett v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lanman v. Upper Arlington Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Leach v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Price v. DryerOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- LuMac Development Corp. v. Buck Point Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kokenge v. WhetstoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
- Szilvasy v. SaviersOhio Court of Appeals · 1942