In Re Morrow
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The appellant, Elroy Morrow, appeals an order committing him to the custody of the director of the Iowa Department of Human Services for treatment under Iowa Code chapter 229A, Iowa’s Sexually Violent Predator Act. Morrow makes two arguments on appeal: (1) he contends the Act violates his right to equal protection; and (2) he asserts the trial process established by the Act violates his right to due process. We find no merit in these arguments and, therefore, we affirm.
I. Statutory Framework.
Before we discuss Morrow’s claims, it is helpful to briefly review the pertinent parts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- In Re the Detention of GarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.