Legal Opinion

Mitkof Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 14, 1991No. 90-345CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss count VIII of the complaint, as amended, or in the alternative, for summary judgment on that count. In count VIII, plaintiff claims that the Forest Service violated section 4 of the Federal Timber Contract Payment Modification Act (the “Modification Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 619 (1988) (“section 4”), and failed to provide the relief statutorily mandated thereby. The motion raises three questions in connection with the Modification Act: 1) whether section 4 reasonably can be construed as “money mandating”; 2) if it can, whether the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API