Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
On January 23, 1992, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed on the basis of the decision in Grey v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 285 (1990), aff’d, 935 F.2d 281 (Fed.Cir. 1991), and cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 934, 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992). The Grey plaintiffs were individual members of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (the “Tribe”). The plaintiff in this case is the Tribe itself. This case arises out of the same facts as Grey. After reviewing the papers submitted by the parties, we find that the reasoning from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Trustees of Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Grey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.