Banks v. Downing
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
Throughout his brief, the plaintiff treats the City Building and the County Building as one, but the Legislature has never done so. The two were authorized by separate Acts; title to them is held separately by Legislative mandate; the statute creating the Public Building Commission speaks of them as separate buildings, requires separate budgets for them, and imposes the cost of maintaining each upon the City and County, respectively. The situation, therefore, differs from that in Bell v. City of Pittsburgh, 297 Pa. 185,146 A. 567, 64 A. L. R. 1542, where one building was shared by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartness v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Bell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- County Commissioners v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Dineen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Delaware Liquor Store, Inc. v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shellhorn & Hill, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Williamson Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Shellburne, Inc. v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
- Heffner v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Zieja v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987