Hanna v. De Koch
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a change of place of trial. The motion was denied upon the grounds that appellant had failed to demand, in writing, that the trial of the cause be had in the proper county, and that she had filed no sufficient affidavit of merits, both as required by Code of Civil Procedure, section 396.
[1] The appellant concedes that she presented no “demand” in terms, but she contends that demand was substantially made in other papers filed in the proceeding. She refers to her petition for change and to a certain notice that the matter would be heard at a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Pennie v. VisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Nevada Transit Co. v. Harris Brothers Lumber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Hetletved v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Wells v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946