Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Los Angeles Traction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1902No. L.A. No. 1030PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffe,who are husband and wife, to recover damages for alleged injuries to the person of the wife. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs in the court below. Defendant appeals-from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Appellant contends for a reversal on the grounds that, upon the evidence, plaintiffs were, as a matter of law, guilty of contributory negligence which precludes a recovery; but this contention cannot be maintained. Appellant was at the time mentioned in the complaint operating an electric street railroad in the city of Los Angeles on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Heirn v. M'CaughanMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. United States v. FotopulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Lejeune v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Spiking v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API