Legal Opinion

Carabajal v. Candelaria

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1958No. 6393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

We are asked to determine on this appeal' whether the district court of Bernalillo County had power after the remand of Armijo v. Town of Atrisco, 62 N.M. 440, 312 P.2d 91, for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in said cause, to allow attorney fees in substantial amount for the benefit of attorneys representing appellees, the prevailing parties on said appeal.

This is not the first time we have had before us appeals dealing with the Town of Atrisco Grant and its affairs. See, Armijo v. Town of Atrisco, 56 N.M. 2, 291 P.2d 535, and Armijo v. Town of Atrisco,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Konig v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Town of Atrisco v. MonohanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Matter of Estate of FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Flynn v. KucharskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Price v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API