Legal Opinion

Cizek v. Cizek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1904No. 12,968PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county; Albert J. Cornish, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

Michael Cizek, hereinafter styled the defendant, brought suit for' divorce against Anna Cizek, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff. The latter filed a cross-petition, praying that she be granted a divorce: alleging certain facts evidently intended as a claim that the property in controversy in the present cause had been purchased with her money and Avas, in justice and equity, her separate property, held in trust for her by her husband; and seeking to have the title thereto quieted in her and an award of alimony. Defendant failed to comply with an order for temporary alimony,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doane v. DunhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Furrow v. AtheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Nygren v. NygrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Swansen v. SwansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bartlett v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Dier v. DierNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Cain v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Vasquez v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API