Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1944No. 4-7306PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

The parties were married in 1912 and lived together as husband and wife until sometime after 1939. Appellee (the husband) filed suit for divorce alleging that he had lived separate and apart from his wife for three consecutive years without cohabitation. Appellant (the wife) resisted the divorce on three grounds, .being: (1) deliial of bona fide residence in Arkansas of the.husband; (2) cohabitation within three years, and (3) recrimination by the husband. The chancery court entered a- decree awarding the husband a divorce; and from that decree comes this appeal raising the issues hereafter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Barker v. DaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Cizek v. CizekNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hester v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Gladish v. LovewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. McNew v. McNewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Reddington v. ReddingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API