Legal Opinion

Mansur Ex Rel. Mansur v. PFL Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2009No. 08-5138PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Brent Mansur, as next Mend of Betty Mansur, appeals from a summary judgment granted by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in favor of PFL Life Insurance Company. 1 A PFL long-term-care policy (the Policy) provided lifetime coverage to Mrs. Mansur for care in a nursing home or similar long-term-care facility, paying up to $80 per day during her confinement. Although the Policy did not require payment of benefits for any services provided to her outside a long-term-care facility, it did offer the possibility of benefits for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Potts v. Ctr. for Excellence in Higher Educ., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co v. Okmulgee Inn Venture, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Berry v. Time InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
  4. Hanover American Insurance v. BalfourCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Hartnett v. Jackson National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API