Massey v. Helman
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
A prisoner and a prison doctor join together to bring this case.
It must be dismissed.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Michael Massey is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Facility in Pekin, Illinois (“Pekin Facility” or “Pekin”). He contends that he .did not receive proper treatment for a hernia and that this improper treatment constituted a denial of his Eighth Amendment right to receive adequate medical care. He specifically contends that three policies of the Bureau of Prisons resulted in his inadequate medical care. 1
Plaintiff John Otten was a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Odumosu v. KellerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Dupuy v. SamuelsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Massey v. HelmanDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999