Legal Opinion

Massey v. Helman

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided February 2, 1999No. 97-1401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

A prisoner and a prison doctor join together to bring this case.

It must be dismissed.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Michael Massey is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Facility in Pekin, Illinois (“Pekin Facility” or “Pekin”). He contends that he .did not receive proper treatment for a hernia and that this improper treatment constituted a denial of his Eighth Amendment right to receive adequate medical care. He specifically contends that three policies of the Bureau of Prisons resulted in his inadequate medical care. 1

Plaintiff John Otten was a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Odumosu v. KellerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  3. Dupuy v. SamuelsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Massey v. HelmanDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API