Legal Opinion

City of Holdenville v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1956No. 36906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Justice.

This is an action by Paul Moore and Jewel Moore, his wife, to recover property damage against the City of Holdenville, Oklahoma, defendant, alleged to have been sustained by reason of sewage from defendant’s main sewer line backing up into their basement through ’ laterals connected with the main sewer lines and overflowing their basement in which was kept and located carpets, and other household supplies, causing damage thereto and to the floor and walls of the basement.

Plaintiffs in their petition, in substance, allege: that on the 19th day of July, 1953, plaintiffs, who at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. City of Mangum v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Johnson v. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. City of Muskogee v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. West v. ClopineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Condo v. BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Pfleiderer v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Holdenville v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Davis v. Town of CashionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Stoneking v. Orleans VillageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API