Hassett v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
This is an action upon a policy of insurance, written by defendant, insuring, among other things, against fraudulent disposal or concealment of an automobile. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the sum of $273.50, from which defendant appeals.
The facts giving rise to this litigation are as follows:
■ On July 10, 1925, respondent sold, by contract of conditional sale, a Ford automobile to A. Peterson and Lee D. Maltby for the sum of $447.25, of which $135 was paid in cash, the balance of $312.25 to be paid in monthly installments. Possession of the automobile was delivered to the vendees on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delanty v. Yang Tsze InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Hefner v. Great American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Cushing v. Williamsburg City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Commercial Credit Co. v. National Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Knutzen Auto Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pacific Queen Fisheries v. L. Symes, Pacific Queen Fisheries v. Atlas Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Kelly v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964