Legal Opinion

Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1971No. C.D. 4244PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fora, Judge:

We have before us for determination the proper classification of certain Gate Valve Bodies produced by a forging operation. The imported articles designated as items 3111 and 685 Gate Valve Bodies, were classified by the district director as parts for hand operated valves used to control the flow of liquids, gases or solids under item 680.22, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and as such were assessed with duty at the rate of 16 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends the imported merchandise consists of forgings as provided for in item 608.25, Tariff Schedules of the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Saltonstall v. WiebuschSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edward W. Daniel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Algoma Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API